Rifkind versus superior court

Author: obqw

August undefined, 2024

WebRifkind v. Superior Court, 22 Cal. App. 4th 1255 (1994): Argued successfully, and established precedent of widespread use that “contention” deposition questions are improper. WebJul 28, 2024 · In Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255, the deponent was instructed not to answer various “contention” questions. In response, the deposing party brought a motion to compel, which the court …

Riffing on Rifkind: Handling The Improper "Instruction Not To …

WebSuperior Court, supra, 117 Cal.App.3d 798, nor Rifkind v. Superior Court, supra, 123 Cal.App.3d 1045, was the information sought more than marginally relevant. However, Rifkind and Dompeling both state important principles to apply in considering disclosure of financial information. Dompeling v. WebApr 12, 2024 · Court, the District of Columbia, or any agency thereof of JLI’s past, present, or future conduct. JLI shall not represent or imply that the Attorney General, the Court, the District of Columbia, or any agency thereof has approved or approves of any of JLI’s actions or any of JLI’s past, present, or future business practices. I. DEFINITIONS 1. farmington hills mi population

Bethel Superior Court Judge dismisses challenge to ADFG …

WebRifkind finds the asserted constitutional right in the Supreme Court's recent expressions that due process forbids the states from imposing punitive damages without judicial review of the trier of fact's assessment of them. That position was adumbrated in Pacific Mut. WebRichard Rifkind, Robert S. Rifkind. Residence. Upper East Side. Education. City College of New York ( B.S.) Columbia Law School ( LL.B.) Simon Hirsch Rifkind (June 5, 1901 – November 14, 1995) was a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and trial lawyer . WebApr 9, 2024 · In evaluating discovery violations, the Court is required to engage in a two-step inquiry. First, the Court must determine if a violation of Superior Court Criminal Rule 16 occurred.16 If no violation occurred, the Court will end its inquiry.17 If, however, the Court concludes a discovery violation has occurred, the farmington hills mi property taxes

Rifkind v. Superior Court California Court of Appeal 02-23-1994 ...

Rifkind & Sterling, Inc. v. Rifkind (1994) :: :: California Court of ...

Webquestion implicates Rifkind, a privilege, work product, or privacy. (Stewart v. Colonial Western Agency, Inc. (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 1006, 1015; Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255, 1259.) was seeking discovery of a 28-page report. The Rifkind court found that it is improper to ask a party to state its legal WebSuperior Court (Good) (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255 [27 Cal.Rptr.2d 822]Rifkind v. Superior Court (Good) (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255 , 27 Cal.Rptr.2d 822[No. B075946.Second LawLink Deals Law Center Law Posts Law Documents Questions & Answers California Cases free reading apps for kids 9-12WebSep 30, 1981 · ROBERT GORE RIFKIND, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; GOGI GRANT RIFKIND, Real Party in Interest. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four. September 30, 1981. farmington hills mi movie theater

"WebAnd the Rule of Rifkind Probably the single most important Cali fornia deposition case is the Second District's decision in Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255 (27 Cal.Rptr.2d 822]. Rifkind is an absolute must-know case for any litigator who de fends depositions, that is, all of us. It is " - Rifkind versus superior court

Rifkind versus superior court

DANIEL GIRCH VS LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, ET AL.

WebFeb 22, 1994 · Rifkind v. Superior Court 22 Cal.App.4th 1255 (1994) Cited 9 times California Court of Appeal February 22, 1994 EPSTEIN, Acting P.J.: The petitioner in this case, an attorney, was sued by another attorney for improperly withdrawing money held in a joint account pending resolution of a fee dispute between them. WebEstablished in 1777, the superior courts are North Carolina’s oldest courts. Superior courts hear civil and criminal cases. Superior court is divided into five divisions and 48 districts across the state. Every six months, superior …

Did you know?

WebRifkind v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 123 Cal.App.3d 1045, 177 Cal.Rptr. 82 (1981); see Wells v. Wells, 108 Misc.2d 501, 437 N.Y.S.2d 622 (1981); Borg v. Borg, 32 Ill.App.3d 1075, 337 N.E.2d 391 (1...... Kaye v. Kaye United States New York Supreme Court Appellate Division July 16, 1984 ... (Quick v. WebMar 1, 2024 · The court first discussed analogous cases, including Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255, holding that it was improper to ask at deposition “ ‘legal contention questions,’ ” which questions were condemned as requiring the party “ ‘to make a “law-to-fact” application that is beyond the competence of most lay persons.’

WebThe Path to Power читать онлайн. In her international bestseller, The Downing Street Years, Margaret Thatcher provided an acclaimed account of her years as Prime Minister. This second volume reflects WebSecond Dist., Div. Four. Feb 23, 1994.] ROBERT GORE RIFKIND, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; NED GOOD, Real Party in Interest. [Opinion certified for partial publication. fn. * ] (Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. BC048093, Edward M. Ross, Judge.)

WebAn objection that every plaintiff lawyer should use is based upon Rifkind v. Sup. Ct. (Good) (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255. Rifkind is a case you need to read if you defend depositions. Basically, the Rifkind objection applies to questions asking a deponent to explain his or her contentions in the case. WebRifkind plaintiff to own their truth. It will legal contention objections because a question incorporates the term “discrimination” or “retaliation.” (Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255.) You can object, but recognize the question presents the plaintiff with an opportunity to hit one out of the park.

WebGreen v. Superior Honda et al Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TONI ANN GREEN CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 23-111 SUPERIOR HONDA, et al. SECTION M (5) ORDER & REASONS Before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by defendant American Honda Finance Corporation (“American Honda”).1 The …

WebSep 28, 1994 · Rifkind finds the asserted constitutional right in the Supreme Court's recent expressions that due process forbids the states from imposing punitive damages without judicial review of the trier of fact's assessment of them. That position was adumbrated in … free reading apps for kids starfallWebLike the superior court division, district courts hold trials and empanel juries to determine the facts of specific cases. District courts handle serious, but lower level crimes, and civil cases between $10,000 - $25,000. The state is divided into district court districts where the court usually sits in the county seat of each county. free reading assessments for middle schoolWebApr 11, 2024 · A Connecticut Superior Court judge put a temporary halt last week on a decision by state utility regulators to reduce the water rates of Aquarion customers in response to the company’s request ... free reading apps on iosWebMay 27, 2024 · One case California litigators must have in their arsenal is Rifkind v. Superior Court , 22 Cal. App. 4th 1257 (1994). Counsel defending depositions will often lodge Rifkind objections to justify an instruction that the deponent not answer a question. free reading assessment onlineWeb2 days ago · It is difficult to prove libel in the American legal system, thanks in large part to New York Times v. Sullivan, the 1964 Supreme Court decision that is considered as critical to the First ... farmington hills mi special servicesWebCOURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PAUL A. FIORAVANTI, JR. VICE CHANCELLOR LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER 500N. KING STREET, UITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734 April 14, 2024 Daniel A. Mason, Esquire Elizabeth Wang, Esquire Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite … farmington hills mi taxesWebRifkind v. Superior Court, 123 Cal. App. 3d 1045 (Cal. Ct. App. 1981) California Court of Appeal Filed: September 30th, 1981 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 123 Cal. App. 3d 1045, 177 Cal. Rptr. 82 Docket Number: 62273 Author: Gordon L. Files 123 Cal.App.3d 1045 (1981) 177 Cal. Rptr. 82 ROBERT GORE RIFKIND, Petitioner, v. farmington hills mi school district